https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hIFDaGs8l8
I'm trying to mix it up a little bit, so if you have the time, try watching the video linked above. It discusses how Hillary Clinton would govern, should she be elected. And with the election coming up soon, I'm sure everyone is curious to know what it might be like if she becomes our president. Of course- keep in mind this is from Vox, so it is going to be biased, and it is going to be opinionated. Venture on with that in mind.
One of the biggest things this reporter discusses is Clinton's abilities as a listener. He says that despite the public's view of her as a cold, calculating person, the people she has worked with always describe her as warm. They often cite listening as her greatest quality, and the reporter says that Clinton is extremely good at listening to what the people want, and going out and getting it done. And she's been successful, a lot. But the reporter also criticizes that Clinton doesn't always succeed. Whether if it's because she listens to the wrong people, or because she tries to please too many at once, sometimes her skill isn't always a gift. The reporter does praise, however, Clinton's willingness to compromise. In an interview she mentions the importance of continuously reaching out to others, even if they are your opponent.
Discussion Questions:
1. Many criticize Clinton for being wishy-washy. They say she changes her mind a lot (ie. she didn't support same sex marriage before, but now she does). However, is this actually a good thing because it reflects that she listens to the people and what they want? Or does it simply mean she's indecisive?
2. If you had to choose between the qualities of being a good speaker or being a good listener, which would you prefer in a president?
3. If Clinton becomes president, do you think that she'll do a good job?
WE DON’T agree with President-elect Donald Trump on much, but we happen to share his view that the Obama administration overreached in trying to rewrite immigration law unilaterally. Still, tough enforcement is one thing; gratuitous cruelty is another. Mr. Trump would be straying squarely into the second category if his immigration crackdown targets youngsters whom Mr. Obama has shielded from deportation since 2012. Under that program, 750,000 undocumented immigrants and mainly teenagers and 20-somethings who grew up in America and graduated from U.S. high schools — have received work permits and Social Security cards. Most have jobs; they pay taxes, open bank accounts and, for the most part, live productive, law-abiding lives. It would serve no public policy purpose to pursue this cohort of young people, most of whom were brought to America as children by their parents, and are undocumented through no fault of their own. Half have relatives who are U.S. citizens; roughly a quarter have children who were born here.To round them up, or threaten them with deportation, would mean hounding families who have lived here for well over a decade. Most of the youngsters are as culturally American as their U.S.-born neighbors; many are building careers that will contribute to their communities. They make no secret of their immigration status or whereabouts, having registered openly with the government under the Obama administration’s program. For Mr. Trump to use that database to target them would be a mistake that would brand his new administration as callous and recast this country as America the Punitive. Mr. Trump’s worst instincts on immigration were underscored by news that a notorious hardliner, Kris Kobach, would serve on his transition team. Mr. Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state, has been behind countless crusades over the past decade, many of them thwarted in federal courts, to harass and intimidate immigrants. Mr. Kobach vowed Thursday that the Trump administration would build that “beautiful” wall, and there’s no doubt Mr. Trump has a mandate to do so. It would be a massive waste of money — a $15 billion to $25 billion project that would do nothing to stop visa over-stayers, who represent a third of undocumented immigrants, and relatively little to deter illegal border crossings, already near a 40-year low. No wall is impermeable, and more Mexicans have left the United States than entered since the Great Recession of 2008. And no, Mexico won’t pay for the wall.
